Efficacy of cefmetazole in immunocompetent patients with uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis: A propensity score matching analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of colonic diverticulitis is increasing in Japan. Although antimicrobial chemotherapy is a treatment option, Japanese guidelines for diverticulosis do not recommend any antibiotic in particular and antibiotic selection is left to the discretion of the prescribing physician, who often selects antibiotics with anti-pseudomonal activity. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy of cefmetazole (CMZ) with that of tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) in hospitalized Japanese immunocompetent patients with uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included Japanese immunocompetent patients hospitalized for colonic diverticulitis between April 2019 and March 2022. Participants were divided into the CMZ and TAZ/PIPC groups. After propensity score matching, the intergroup differences in clinical outcomes, including adverse events, mortality, and re-admission rate, were ascertained. RESULTS: During the study period, 142 Japanese patients were hospitalized with community-onset colonic diverticulitis; 124 of these patients were immunocompetent. Of the 124 patients, 42 were excluded, and the CMZ and TAZ/PIPC groups comprised 62 and 20 patients, respectively. After propensity score matching, there were 16 patients in each group. There was no significant intergroup difference in the mortality and re-admission rates; however, the incidence of liver dysfunction was significantly higher (p = 0.018) in the TAZ/PIPC group. CONCLUSION: In patients with colonic diverticulitis, CMZ therapy should be selected because of the adequate clinical outcomes and lower incidence of adverse events, as this would reduce broad-spectrum antibiotic use and minimize antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

The Relationship of Comorbid Diseases and Empirical Antibiotic Usage with Superinfection in COVID-19 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the microorganisms responsible for superinfections in patients admitted with COVID-19 and evaluate the impact of empirical antibiotic regimen and comorbid disease on superinfections comparing COVID-19 patients with and without secondary infection. STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Microbiology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkiye, from March to July 2020. METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted with patients diagnosed with COVID-19 disease based on radiological or quantitative RT-PCR test results. Culture results, demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and therapeutic regimen were collected from medical records. RESULTS: Superinfection developed in 48 (26.96%) of 178 cultures (24 of 101 patients) followed up in the COVID-19 clinics. Infections were determined as 25 (52.08%) bloodstream, 11 (22.9%) urinary tract, 10 (20.8%) respiratory tract and 2 (4.16%) soft tissue infections, respectively. Secondary infectious agents were E.coli in 11 (22.9%), A.baumannii in 8 (16.7%), S.homminis in 7 (14.6%), S.epidermidis in 6 (12.5%), K.pneumoniae in 4 (8.3%), C.albicans in 2 (4.1%), and other bacterial and fungal agents in 10 (20.8%). The median range from admission to the hospital to detecting microorganism growth was the longest with piperacillin/tazobactam with moxifloxacin and azithromycin. Secondary microorganism detection was delayed, mostly due to the empirical use of moxifloxacin, azithromycin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. CONCLUSION: Demographic characteristics, comorbidity and antibiotic use of patients were not directly related to secondary infections. In addition, the empirical use of azithromycin and moxifloxacin with piperacillin/tazobactam appeared to delay the development of superinfection. KEY WORDS: Superinfection, COVID-19, Comorbidity.

Efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane in combination with metronidazole for intraabdominal infection in a hepato-biliary-pancreatic field in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: This single-center study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane (TAZ/CTLZ) in combination with metronidazole for intraabdominal infection in a hepato-biliary-pancreatic field in clinical practice. METHODS: This study included 50 patients, including 35 with intraabdominal abscess or peritonitis, 5 with liver abscess, 4 with cholecystitis, and 6 with cholangitis with sepsis. Of the 50 patients, 29 received TAZ/CTLZ and metronidazole after a prior antibacterial therapy failure, including tazobactam/piperacillin, cefmetazole, and levofloxacin. Source control was performed in 36 patients. RESULTS: The clinical response could be evaluated in 49 patients. The clinical cure rate at end-of-therapy was 91.8% (45 of 49 patients) and that at test-of-cure was 89.6% (43 of 48 patients). Of 5 patients in whom clinical response at test-of-cure was a failure, 1 developed infectious disease during chemoradiotherapy for recurrent cancer and 4 after liver resection or pancreatoduodenectomy. Three of the 4 patients were associated with pancreatic juice leakage. Isolated pathogens were eradicated or presumably eradicated in 27 of 31 (87.1%) patients in whom microbiological response at test-of-cure could be evaluated. The response rate for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae was 87.5%. Nausea was observed in two patients. Aspartate and alanine aminotransferase activities were increased in 3 of the 50 (6.0%) patients. The activities improved after the antibiotic discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study demonstrated that TAZ/CTLZ in combination with metronidazole has a favorable effect without major drug-related adverse events for intraabdominal infection in the hepato-biliary-pancreatic field in clinical practice although the efficacy of TAZ/CTLZ may decrease in compromised patients.

Efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis due to extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Introduction: Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae pose a huge threat to human health, especially in the context of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). Carbapenems and piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) are two antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat cUTIs. Methods: A monocentric retrospective cohort study focused on the treatment of cUTIs in adults was conducted from January 2019 to November 2021. Patients with a positive urine culture strain yielding ≥ 103 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL), and sensitive to PTZ and carbapenems, were included. The primary endpoint was clinical success after antibiotic therapy. The secondary endpoint included rehospitalization and 90-day recurrence of cUTIs caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Results: Of the 195 patients included in this study, 110 were treated with PTZ while 85 were administered meropenem. The rate of clinical cure was similar between the PTZ and meropenem groups (80% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.84). However, the PTZ group had a lower duration of total antibiotic use (6 vs. 9; p < 0.01), lower duration of effective antibiotic therapy (6 vs. 8; p < 0.01), and lower duration of hospitalization (16 vs. 22; p < 0.01). Discussion: In terms of adverse events, the safety of PTZ was higher than that of meropenem in the treatment of cUTIs.

Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem From a Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial in Pediatric Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection.

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane/tazobactam, a cephalosporin-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, is approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric participants with cIAI were assessed. METHODS: This phase 2 study (NCT03217136) randomized participants to either ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole or meropenem for treatment of cIAI in pediatric participants (<18 years). The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole. Clinical cure at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) visits were secondary end points. RESULTS: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included 91 participants (ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole, n = 70; meropenem, n = 21). Complicated appendicitis was the most common diagnosis (93.4%); Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen (65.9%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 80.0% and 61.9% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, drug-related AEs occurred in 18.6% and 14.3% and serious AEs occurred in 11.4% and 0% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, respectively. No drug-related serious AEs or discontinuations due to drug-related AEs occurred. Rates of the clinical cure for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem at EOT were 80.0% and 95.2% (difference: -14.3; 95% confidence interval: -26.67 to 4.93) and at TOC were 80.0% and 100.0% (difference: -19.1; 95% confidence interval: -30.18 to -2.89), respectively; 6 of the 14 clinical failures for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole at TOC were indeterminate responses imputed as failures per protocol. CONCLUSION: Ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole was well tolerated in pediatric participants with cIAI and had a safety profile similar to the established safety profile in adults. In this descriptive efficacy analysis, ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole appeared efficacious.

Cross-reactivity between piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam in drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia.

Beta-lactam antibiotics commonly cause immune thrombocytopenia. Cross-reactivity in patients with drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia has rarely been reported. In this study, we describe the case of a 79-year-old man who developed thrombocytopenia after receiving piperacillin-tazobactam for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and he was successfully treated with meropenem and cefotiam. However, thrombocytopenia recurred after cefoperazone-sulbactam administration. This indicated that cross-reactivity of platelet-specific antibodies occurred between piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam. However, the responsible drug structures remain unknown, requiring further investigation. Likewise, chemical structure similarities among beta-lactam antibiotics must be examined to determine the risk of immune thrombocytopenia in the clinical setting.

Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem in Neonates and Children With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane/tazobactam, a cephalosporin-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, is approved for treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). Safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric participants with cUTI, including pyelonephritis, were assessed. METHODS: This phase 2 study (NCT03230838) compared ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treatment of cUTI in participants from birth to <18 years of age. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Key secondary end points included clinical cure and per-participant microbiologic response rates at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) visits. RESULTS: The microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population included 95 participants (ceftolozane/tazobactam, n = 71; meropenem, n = 24). The most common diagnosis and pathogen were pyelonephritis (ceftolozane/tazobactam, 84.5%; meropenem, 79.2%) and Escherichia coli (ceftolozane/tazobactam, 74.6%; meropenem, 87.5%); 5.7% (ceftolozane/tazobactam) and 4.8% (meropenem) of E. coli isolates were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producers. Rates of adverse events were similar between treatment groups (any: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 59.0% vs. meropenem, 60.6%; drug-related: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 14.0% vs. meropenem, 15.2%; serious: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 3.0% vs. meropenem, 6.1%). Rates of clinical cure for ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem at EOT were 94.4% and 100% and at TOC were 88.7% and 95.8%, respectively. Rates of microbiologic eradication for ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem at EOT were 93.0% and 95.8%, and at TOC were 84.5% and 87.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam had a favorable safety profile in pediatric participants with cUTI; rates of clinical cure and microbiologic eradication were high and similar to meropenem. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a safe and effective new treatment option for children with cUTI, especially due to antibacterial-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Evaluation of the safety of piperacillin-tazobactam extended infusion in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) may be treated with piperacillin-tazobactam (PZT) for acute pulmonary exacerbations. Extending the infusion of PZT is one strategy to increase efficacy. Direct comparison, with respect to the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), between these two strategies has not been evaluated in pediatric patients with CF. The primary objective of this study was to compare the incidence of AKI in pediatric CF patients receiving extended infusion (EI) PZT versus traditional infusion (TI). METHODS: This IRB-approved, retrospective analysis included patients ages 30 days to 18 years that received PZT for at least 48 h between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2020. PZT was infused over 30 min (TI group) or 4 h (EI group). RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients were included (TI: 109, EI: 95). Median age was 8 years (4-13) and 7 years (3-12) in the TI and EI groups (p = 0.15). The groups did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics. There were 12 (11%) AKIs in the TI group and 8 (8.4%) in the EI group (p = 0.53). There was one occurrence of serum sickness in the TI group and none in the EI group. The incidence of thrombocytopenia was similar between the two groups. Median treatment duration was 8 days (5-11) and 9 days (5-13) for the TI and EI groups, respectively (p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant increase in AKI in pediatric patients with CF receiving PZT by EI compared with TI. EI may be utilized to optimize the pharmacokinetics of PZT in pediatric CF patients.

Impact of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Dosing in Septic Shock Patients Using Real-World Evidence: An Observational, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Rapid initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy is essential, as inadequate therapy early during septic shock has been shown to increase the risk of mortality. However, despite the importance of appropriate antibiotic initiation, in clinical practice, concerns for renal dysfunction frequently lead to antibiotic dose reduction, with scant evidence on the impact of this practice in septic shock patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose if this article is to investigate the rate and impact of piperacillin-tazobactam dose adjustment in early phase septic shock patients using real-world electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS: A multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted of septic shock patients who received at least 48 hours of piperacillin-tazobactam therapy and concomitant receipt of norepinephrine. Subjects were stratified into 2 groups according to their cumulative 48-hour piperacillin-tazobactam dose: low piperacillin-tazobactam dosing (LOW; <27 g) group and normal piperacillin-tazobactam dosing (NORM; ≥27 g) group. To account for potential confounding variables, propensity score matching was used. The primary study outcome was 28-day norepinephrine-free days (NFD). RESULTS: In all, 1279 patients met study criteria. After propensity score matching (n = 608), the NORM group had more median NFD (23.9 days [interquartile range, IQR: 0-27] vs 13.6 days [IQR: 0-27], P = 0.021). The NORM group also had lower rates of in-hospital mortality/hospice disposition (25.9% [n = 79] vs 35.5% [n = 108]), P = 0.014). Other secondary outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the propensity score-matched cohort, the NORM group had significantly more 28-day NFD. Piperacillin-tazobactam dose reduction in early phase septic shock is associated with worsened clinical outcomes. Clinicians should be vigilant to avoid piperacillin-tazobactam dose reduction in early phase septic shock.

Relationship between piperacillin concentrations, clinical factors and piperacillin/tazobactam-associated acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam, a commonly used antibiotic, is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). The relationship between piperacillin concentrations and AKI remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: Estimate piperacillin exposures in critically ill children and young adults administered piperacillin/tazobactam to identify concentrations and clinical factors associated with piperacillin-associated AKI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed piperacillin pharmacokinetics in 107 patients admitted to the paediatric ICU who received at least one dose of piperacillin/tazobactam. Piperacillin AUC, highest peak (Cmax) and highest trough (Cmin) in the first 24 hours of therapy were estimated. Piperacillin-associated AKI was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Stage 2/3 AKI present >24 hours after initial piperacillin/tazobactam dose. Likelihood of piperacillin-associated AKI was rated using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify patient and clinical predictors of piperacillin-associated AKI. RESULTS: Out of 107 patients, 16 (15%) were rated as possibly or probably having piperacillin-associated AKI. Estimated AUC and highest Cmin in the first 24 hours were higher in patients with piperacillin-associated AKI (2042 versus 1445 mg*h/L, P = 0.03; 50.1 versus 10.7 mg/L, P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed predictors of piperacillin-associated AKI included higher Cmin (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 1.7-23) and age (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: We show a relationship between estimated piperacillin AUC and highest Cmin in the first 24 hours of piperacillin/tazobactam therapy and piperacillin-associated AKI, suggesting total piperacillin exposure early in the course is associated with AKI development. These data could serve as the foundation for implementation of model-informed precision dosing to reduce AKI incidence in patients given piperacillin/tazobactam.

Definitive antibiotic treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin and with piperacillin-tazobactam worked well for some children with Serratia bacteraemia.

AIM: This study aimed to describe epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Serratia bacteraemia and to identify factors associated with mortality. METHODS: The microbiology database of Schneider Children's Medical Centre of Israel was examined for Serratia marcescens positive blood cultures, between January 2007 and May 2020. Demographic, clinical and microbial characteristics were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients files that met the inclusion criteria, 64 (80%) were of patients hospitalised in paediatric intensive care units. The median age was 78 days and 54% were male. In-hospitalisation mortality was 26%, 62% died under 90 days old. Underlying conditions including prematurity, congenital cardiac defects and malignancies were noted in 95% of patients. Prior to the bloodstream infections, 62% of patients underwent procedures, 64% were on ventilatory support and 77% had central lines. Thrombocytopenia and elevated C-reactive protein levels were found in 60% of the children. Twenty-eight children received definitive monotherapy as either piperacillin-tazobactam or a third-generation cephalosporin; survival rates were similar between the two antibiotic treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, 26% died. Death was more common in young infants. Mortality was associated with hospitalisation in intensive care units and thrombocytopenia. Survival rates following definitive monotherapy were similar for patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and those treated with third-generation cephalosporin.

Association of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam with early changes in creatinine versus cystatin C in critically ill adults: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Although dozens of studies have associated vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam with increased acute kidney injury (AKI) risk, it is unclear whether the association represents true injury or a pseudotoxicity characterized by isolated effects on creatinine secretion. We tested this hypothesis by contrasting changes in creatinine concentration after antibiotic initiation with changes in cystatin C concentration, a kidney biomarker unaffected by tubular secretion. METHODS: We included patients enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiology of SepsiS in the ICU (MESSI) prospective cohort who were treated for ≥ 48 h with vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam or vancomycin + cefepime. Kidney function biomarkers [creatinine, cystatin C, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN)] were measured before antibiotic treatment and at day two after initiation. Creatinine-defined AKI and dialysis were examined through day-14, and mortality through day-30. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for confounding. Multiple imputation was used to impute missing baseline covariates. RESULTS: The study included 739 patients (vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam n = 297, vancomycin + cefepime n = 442), of whom 192 had cystatin C measurements. Vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a higher percentage increase of creatinine at day-two 8.04% (95% CI 1.21, 15.34) and higher incidence of creatinine-defined AKI: rate ratio (RR) 1.34 (95% CI 1.01, 1.78). In contrast, vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam was not associated with change in alternative biomarkers: cystatin C: - 5.63% (95% CI - 18.19, 8.86); BUN: - 4.51% (95% CI - 12.83, 4.59); or clinical outcomes: dialysis: RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.31, 1.29); mortality: RR 1.05 (95%CI 0.79, 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with creatinine-defined AKI, but not changes in alternative kidney biomarkers, dialysis, or mortality, supporting the hypothesis that vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam effects on creatinine represent pseudotoxicity.

Extended infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam versus intermittent infusion in critically ill egyptian patients: a cost-effectiveness study.

Extended infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam over 4 h has been proposed as an alternate mode of administration to the 30-min intermittent infusion to optimize treatment effects in patients with gram-negative bacterial infections. The study aimed to evaluate the extended infusion regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam in standings of efficacy, safety, and cost to the intermittent one in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections. A prospective randomized comparative study was performed on 53 patients, 27 in the intermittent infusion group and 26 in the extended infusion group. The primary outcome was the mean number of days to clinical success and the percentage of patients who were clinically cured after treatment. The secondary outcomes included mortality, readmission within 30-days, and cost-effectiveness analysis based on the mean number of days to clinical success. The clinical success rate was comparable in the two groups. Days on extended infusion were significantly lower than intermittent infusion (5.7 vs 8.9 days, respectively, p = 0.0001) as well as days to clinical success (4.6 vs 8.5 days, respectively, p = 0.026). The extended infusion was superior to the intermittent infusion regarding cost-effectiveness ratio ($1835.41 and $1914.09/expected success, respectively). The more cost-effective regimen was the extended infusion. Both regimens had comparable clinical and microbiological outcomes.

Vancomycin with concomitant piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime or meropenem associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: A multicenter propensity score-matched study.

PURPOSE: The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the AKI incidence associated with concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam compared to either cefepime or meropenem with vancomycin in the ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted in adult ICU patients administered vancomycin in combination with either piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, or meropenem were included. Patients developing AKI ≤48 h following combination therapy initiation were excluded. The primary endpoint was to compare the incidence of AKI associated with concomitant antimicrobial therapy. Multivariable Cox regression modeling in predicting AKI was also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 1044 patients were matched. The AKI incidence in vancomycin- piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin-cefepime/meropenem groups were 21.9% and 16.8%, respectively (p = 0.068). Multivariable prediction models showed concomitant vancomycin-piperacillin/tazobactam was an independent risk factor of AKI using serum creatinine only (HR 1.52, 1.10-2.10, p = 0.011) and serum creatinine with urine output-based KDIGO criteria (HR 1.77, 1.18-2.67, p = 0.006). No significant differences between groups were observed for AKI recovery patterns or mortality. CONCLUSION: Concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam administration in adult ICU patients was independently associated with an increased risk of AKI.

The concomitant use of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in extremely low birth weight infants (ELBW).

BACKGROUND: Late-onset sepsis is common in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, and it leads to the use of antibiotics to cover resistant organisms, which can be nephrotoxic. Here we have investigated the role of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam on the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study, medical records of all ELBW infants who were admitted to our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with late onset sepsis who were prescribed vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam were reviewed for demographics, clinical characteristics, use of potential nephrotoxic medications and outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 264 patients were admitted, of whom 28.4%(75/264) received vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam and were matched with 64 controls. There were no differences in gestational age or birth weight between cases and controls [688±160 vs. 689±162 grams (p = 0.99), and 24.7±1.8 vs. 24.7±1.6 weeks (p = 0.99) respectively]. There was no difference in the rate of sepsis between cases and controls [76%(55/72) vs. 64%(41/64) respectively, p = 0.11]. Infants exposed to vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam had a higher percentage of concomitant use of vasopressors and amphotericin. To adjust for confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted with AKI as the dependent variable. Use of vasopressors and vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam were the only risk factors associated with AKI with an adjusted OR (95%CI) of 4.08 (1.90-8.74), p < 0.001; and 2.87 (1.26-6.53), p = 0.01 respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam in ELBW infants is associated with an increased risk for AKI.

A puerperal patient with agranulocytosis during tazobactam / piperacillin administration†:†A case report.

Tazobactam / piperacillin (TAZ / PIPC) is an injectable combination drug consisting of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a ß-lactamase inhibitor. This antimicrobial has a wide spectrum of efficacy against both Gram-positive bacteria and anaerobes. Adverse events usually present as diarrhea or liver dysfunction ; agranulocytosis has not been reported in Japanese patients with puerperal disorders. However, we report a 32-year-old Japanese woman who received TAZ / PIPC to treat an intraperitoneal infection that developed after complications related to transvaginal delivery. Within 14 days of beginning TAZ / PIPC therapy, the patient developed agranulocytosis, indicated by a white blood cell count of 1900 cells / µL and a neutrophil count of 475 cells / µL. We discontinued TAZ / PIPC at this point and changed the antimicrobial to meropenem. Seven days later, her white blood cell count increased to 3700 cells / µL (neutrophil count : 1684 cells / µL), and the intraperitoneal infection resolved. Patients receiving TAZ / PIPC should be monitored periodically for agranulocytosis as well as for diarrhea and liver dysfunction. J. Med. Invest. 68 : 368-371, August, 2021.

[Efficacy and safety of empirical treatment with piperacillin/tazobactan as monotherapy in episodes of neutropenia and fever in children with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento empírico con piperacilina/tazobactan como monoterapia en episodios de neutropenia y fiebre en niños con cáncer: revisión sistemática y meta-análisis.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia in children with onco-hematological diseases is an important cause of morbidity and mortality and requires early and adequate empirical treatment. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate if piperacillin/ tazobactan (PTZ) monotherapy leads to a lower incidence of therapeutic failures than comparators. METHODS: A literature search was carried out in Embase, and MEDLINE databases using the search terms ('febrile neutropenia' OR hemato oncology OR haemato oncology OR 'immunocompromised host' OR 'immunocompromised patient' OR 'chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia') AND (piperacillin OR tazobactam OR 'piperacillin plus tazobactam' OR 'piperacillin/tazobactam' OR 'piperacillin-tazobactam' OR tazocin OR 'piperacillin-tazobactam drug combination')), Efficacy endpoint was treatment failure rate. The safety end-point was absence of any adverse effects (AE). RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. No heterogeneity was detected ( I 2 0%). The risk of failure was not superior for piperacillin/tazobactan to comparators (Global RR: 0.94; IC95% 0.83 a 1.07). Rates of adverse events were similar among studies. No publication bias was detected (p 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that treating episodes of febrile neutropenia in oncology pediatric patients, the risk of failure for PTZ was not superior to comparators. Adverse events were similar to the comparators.

Impact of Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve on the Prevalence of Vancomycin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Combination With Tazobactam/Piperacillin or Cefepime: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Risk for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN) is reportedly reduced by AUC-guided vancomycin dosing. However, it remains unknown whether the increased VIN risk in combination treatment with vancomycin and tazobactam/piperacillin, which is a VIN risk factor, can be diminished by AUC-guided vancomycin dosing (vancomycin-AUC). The aim of this study was to assess whether the evaluation of vancomycin-AUC + tazobactam/piperacillin (VT) combination therapy could prevent VIN. METHODS: The data from patients who received VT or vancomycin + cefepime (VC; the control group) at Tokushima University Hospital (Kuramoto, Japan) between April 2010 and March 2020 were analyzed in this retrospective study. The between-group difference in the prevalence of VIN onset, stratified by AUC, was investigated. The AUC of vancomycin was calculated using the Bayesian method with the blood concentration of vancomycin. The risk factors and probability of VIN onset from the vancomycin exposure-toxicity curve were evaluated using the logistic model. FINDINGS: The prevalences of VIN were 29.5% (18/61) and 7.1% (3/42) in the VT and VC groups, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of data from all patients revealed concurrent use of tazobactam/piperacillin (odds ratio [OR] = 4.59; P = 0.039) and AUC increase (OR = 1.01; P < 0.01) as risk factors for VIN, but only concurrent use of tazobactam/piperacillin was identified as a risk factor in patients with an AUC of <600 µg · h/mL, the guideline-recommended value (OR = 9.52; P = 0.041). Moreover, the vancomycin exposure-toxicity curve showed that in the guideline-recommended AUC range, VIN probability was consistently higher and the slope of VIN probability was greater in the VT group than in the VC group. IMPLICATIONS: VIN risk was higher with VT than with VC, even when the AUC was controlled to the guideline-recommended range. These results strongly suggest that VIN prevention may be difficult with AUC-guided vancomycin dosing in patients receiving VT.

Incidence of acute kidney injury after teicoplanin- or vancomycin- and piperacillin/tazobactam combination therapy: A comparative study using propensity score matching analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Combination therapy with vancomycin (VCM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Teicoplanin (TEIC) has a lower risk of AKI than VCM. Currently, the difference in AKI risk after TEIC-PIPC/TAZ combination therapy and VCM-PIPC/TAZ combination therapy is controversial. This study aimed to compare AKI incidence after treatment with these two drug combinations using propensity score matching analysis. METHODS: This single-center cohort study used data extracted from patients' medical records. We included patients who received TEIC-PIPC/TAZ therapy (TEIC group) or VCM-PIPC/TAZ therapy (VCM group). After propensity score matching, AKI incidence, AKI stage, 30-day mortality, and time to AKI incidence were compared between the groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 94 patients were matched in each group. AKI incidence was significantly lower in the TEIC group than in the VCM group (10.6% vs. 23.4%, odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.39 [0.17-0.88], p = 0.03). AKI stage, 30-day mortality, and time to AKI incidence were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that AKI incidence may be lower in patients undergoing combination therapy with TEIC-PIPC/TAZ than in those receiving therapy with VCM-PIPC/TAZ. To prevent the occurrence of AKI, clinicians may need to choose TEIC instead of VCM for patients receiving PIPC/TAZ.